•  

  • Menu
  • About
  • Books
  • Interviews
  • Articles
  • Speaking Events
  • Video of Talks
  • Empire Bytes Blog

Deepa Kumar

Empire Bytes


Judge rules that it is okay to kill US citizens using drones

Published by Deepa Kumar on April 15, 2014

A federal judge made a serious error recently in throwing out an important case about whether the U.S. government can kill U.S. citizens abroad without due process. Three U.S. citizens Anwar Al-Aulaki, Abdulrahman Al-Aulaki, and Samir Khan were executed in US drone strikes in Yemen in 2011. Their families brought a lawsuit to obtain justice.

The government’s case against Anwar Al-Aulaki was that he posed an “imminent threat” to the United States, and that it was impossible to capture him, so extrajudicial assassination was necessary. But contrary to the claim that capturing him was not possible, Al-Aulaki’s hosts in Southern Yemen were reportedly willing to hand him over to Yemeni authorities if a fair trial could be guaranteed. Yet, the Obama administration chose to go ahead with the strike.

In a 16-page white paper leaked to NBC News, the Obama administration argued that “clear evidence” of a “specific attack” was not needed and that if a “high-level official” drew the conclusion that an individual was an “operational leader of Al Qaeda or an associated force,” that was enough to kill the person.

In short, without any actual proof of a plot (which would make a person an imminent threat), the government has determined it can mete out the ultimate punishment—death.

On April 4, Judge Rosemary Collyer threw out the lawsuit even while she noted that the case raised serious constitutional issues. Troublingly, she held that government officials “must be trusted and expected to act in accordance with the U.S. Constitution when they intentionally target a U.S. citizen abroad at the direction of the president and with the concurrence of Congress.”

Why should we blindly trust our leaders? If in fact they had evidence against Al-Aulaki, should they not have provided it in court?

But perhaps the most disturbing aspect of this case is that no government official will be held accountable for the murder of the 16- year-old Abdulrahman. A U.S. drone killed the younger Al-Aulaki two weeks after a CIA drone killed his father and Samir Khan, who was the editor of a magazine sympathetic to Al Qaeda.

Abdulrahman Al-Aulaki was guilty of no crime.

Judge Collyer’s ruling, in effect, lets the government get away with the murder of U.S. citizens. Further, by denying the families justice, it perpetuates a systematically racist legal system that treats Muslim Americans unfairly

This ruling is a disaster, and the policy of killing Americans is a disgrace.

This piece originally appeared at The Progressive.

  • Share on Facebook.
  • Share on Twitter.
  • Share on LinkedIn
Posted in Empire Bytes | Tagged Anwar Al-Aulaki, Anwar Al-Awlaki, Drones, extrajudicial killing

← Previous Next →

Deepa Kumar

Contact

Featured Video

 

Constructing the Terrorist Threat: a new documentary on Islamophobia, the Media and the War on Terror, featuring Professor Deepa Kumar.

To order visit Media Education Foundation

Follow & Subscribe

Follow Deepa Kumar on FacebookFollow Deepa Kumar on TwitterFollow Deepa Kumar on YouTubeFollow Deepa Kumar on RSSFollow Deepa Kumar on E-mail
Follow EmpireBytes via Email

Empire Bytes Blog Recent Posts

  • If you struggle, you can win
  • Play it Again, (Uncle) Sam: A Brief History of US Imperialism, Propaganda, and the News
  • Imperialist Feminism and Liberalism
  • ISIS, 9/11, and the Terrorism Time Loop
  • “Telegenically Dead”: Israel’s Crumbling Media War

Tags

9/11 Clash of Civilizations Cordoba House Controversty Islam Islamophobia Israel and the Middle East Middle East Orientalism Terrorism United States

  • About
  • Books
  • Interviews
  • Articles
  • Speaking Events
  • Video of Talks
  • Empire Bytes Blog

Copyright © 2019 Deepa Kumar. Powered by WordPress and Spine.